Skip to content

Counterparty Risk

Counterparty risk is the risk that the other party to a transaction will fail to perform their obligations. In commodity trading, this can mean buyers who don’t pay, sellers who don’t deliver, or banks that fail to honor guarantees.

Types of Counterparty Exposure

Exposure Categories

PhaseExposure TypeRisk
Pre-deliveryReplacement costSeller defaults, must buy elsewhere
DeliveryFull cargo valueGoods delivered, not paid
Post-paymentSettlementPayment made, goods not received
FinancialDerivative MTMHedge counterparty defaults

Exposure Calculation

COUNTERPARTY EXPOSURE CALCULATION
─────────────────────────────────
PRE-DELIVERY (Seller exposure):
Contract value: $100M
Mark-to-market gain: $5M (price rose)
Replacement cost: $105M
Current exposure: $5M (the MTM gain we'd lose)
POST-DELIVERY (Buyer exposure):
Invoice value: $100M
Payment status: Outstanding
Current exposure: $100M
DERIVATIVE COUNTERPARTY:
Swap notional: $50M
MTM value: +$3M (in our favor)
Current exposure: $3M
TOTAL EXPOSURE TO COUNTERPARTY X:
$5M + $100M + $3M = $108M

Credit Assessment

Assessment Framework

CREDIT ASSESSMENT PROCESS
─────────────────────────
1. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
- Balance sheet review
- Income statement trends
- Cash flow analysis
- Key ratios
2. QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT
- Management quality
- Business model
- Market position
- Industry outlook
3. EXTERNAL RATINGS
- S&P, Moody's, Fitch (if rated)
- Bank references
- Trade references
4. COUNTRY ASSESSMENT
- Sovereign risk
- Transfer risk
- Legal environment
5. CREDIT DECISION
- Internal rating assigned
- Credit limit set
- Terms determined

Key Ratios

RatioFormulaHealthy Range
Current ratioCurrent assets / Current liab>1.5
Quick ratio(CA - Inventory) / CL>1.0
Debt/EquityTotal debt / Equity<2.0
Interest coverageEBIT / Interest expense>3.0
Days payableAP × 365 / Purchases<60

Credit Scoring

INTERNAL CREDIT RATING
──────────────────────
SCORING FACTORS:
Financial Strength (40%):
- Liquidity: 10%
- Leverage: 15%
- Profitability: 15%
Business Profile (30%):
- Market position: 10%
- Business model: 10%
- Management: 10%
External Factors (30%):
- Industry outlook: 10%
- Country risk: 10%
- Track record with us: 10%
RATING SCALE:
A: Excellent (80-100 points)
B: Good (60-79)
C: Acceptable (40-59)
D: Elevated risk (20-39)
E: High risk (<20) - Decline
EXAMPLE:
Company X scores 68 → Rating B
→ Credit limit $50M
→ Terms: L/C or 30-day open account

Credit Limits

Limit Structure

CREDIT LIMIT FRAMEWORK
──────────────────────
BY RATING:
Rating Max Exposure Terms
A $100M 60-day open
B $50M 30-day open or L/C
C $20M L/C at sight
D $5M L/C sight, confirmed
E $0 Decline
BY TRANSACTION TYPE:
Open account: Full risk
L/C at sight: Issuing bank risk only
Confirmed L/C: Confirming bank risk
Prepayment: No credit risk

Limit Monitoring

CREDIT EXPOSURE REPORT
──────────────────────
TOP 10 COUNTERPARTIES:
Counterparty Rating Exposure Limit %Used
────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Refiner A A $85M $100M 85%
Trading Co B B $48M $50M 96% ⚠️
Utility C A $62M $100M 62%
Producer D B $38M $50M 76%
Smelter E C $18M $20M 90% ⚠️
...
ALERTS:
⚠️ Trading Co B: 96% utilization
Action: Review before new trades
⚠️ Smelter E: 90% utilization
Action: Request L/C for next trade
CONCENTRATION:
Top 5 counterparties: 45% of total exposure
Policy maximum: 50%
Status: Within limit ✓

Risk Mitigation

Security Instruments

InstrumentProtection LevelCost
L/C at sightHigh (bank guarantee)0.2-0.5%
Confirmed L/CVery high (2 banks)0.5-1.5%
Credit insuranceHigh (85-95% recovery)0.3-1.0%
Parent guaranteeDepends on parentNegotiated
PrepaymentFull protectionInterest cost
Retention of titleLegal protectionNone

Credit Insurance

CREDIT INSURANCE
────────────────
STRUCTURE:
Insurer: Euler Hermes / Coface / Atradius
Coverage: 90% of invoice value
Premium: 0.5% of insured sales
Deductible: 10% (our retention)
PROCESS:
1. Request credit limit from insurer
2. Insurer assesses buyer
3. Limit granted (or declined)
4. Ship goods, report shipments
5. If default → file claim
6. Receive 90% after waiting period
EXAMPLE:
Invoice: $10M
Buyer defaults
Recovery from insurance: $9M (90%)
Our loss: $1M (10%)
WITHOUT INSURANCE:
Our loss: $10M

Netting Arrangements

NETTING EXAMPLE
───────────────
WITH COUNTERPARTY X:
EXPOSURES:
We owe them: $30M (receivable for cargo)
They owe us: $50M (payable for cargo)
WITHOUT NETTING:
Our exposure: $50M
Their exposure: $30M
Total at risk: $80M
WITH NETTING AGREEMENT:
Net exposure: $50M - $30M = $20M
They owe us net: $20M
Total at risk: $20M
If they default:
Without netting: We lose $50M, still owe $30M
With netting: We lose $20M net
LEGAL REQUIREMENT:
Master netting agreement in place
Enforceable under bankruptcy law

Watchlist and Deterioration

Early Warning Signs

SignalDescriptionAction
Payment delaysPaying lateReview, reduce limits
Financial deteriorationWeakening ratiosReassess rating
Management changesKey person leavesDue diligence
News/rumorNegative pressInvestigate
Rating downgradeExternal agency actionImmediate review
Industry stressSector downturnPortfolio review

Watchlist Management

CREDIT WATCHLIST
────────────────
COUNTERPARTY: Industrial Co Y
RATING: B → Watch
TRIGGER: Payment delayed by 15 days
ACTIONS TAKEN:
1. Called counterparty - cash flow issue cited
2. Reviewed financials - leverage increased
3. Reduced limit from $50M to $30M
4. Required L/C for next shipment
5. Weekly monitoring initiated
NEXT REVIEW: 30 days
ESCALATION:
If payment >30 days late → Move to D rating
If payment >60 days late → Provision/write-off

Default Management

Default Response

DEFAULT RESPONSE PROTOCOL
─────────────────────────
DAY 1-3: Immediate response
- Halt all new transactions
- Secure all documents
- Calculate total exposure
- Notify management
DAY 3-10: Assessment
- Determine recovery prospects
- Engage legal counsel
- Contact insurer (if insured)
- Assess collateral
DAY 10-30: Recovery action
- Formal demand letter
- Negotiate settlement
- Consider legal action
- Initiate insurance claim
ONGOING: Workout
- Monitor counterparty status
- Negotiate restructuring
- Realize collateral
- Record write-offs

Provisioning

PROVISIONING POLICY
───────────────────
AGING:
0-30 days overdue: 0% provision
31-60 days overdue: 25% provision
61-90 days overdue: 50% provision
>90 days overdue: 100% provision
EXAMPLE:
Receivable: $10M
60 days overdue
Provision: 50% = $5M
ACCOUNTING:
Debit: Bad debt expense $5M
Credit: Allowance for doubtful accounts $5M
RECOVERY:
If $8M eventually collected:
Debit: Cash $8M
Credit: Allowance $5M
Credit: Bad debt recovery $3M

Key Takeaways

  1. Know your exposure — Calculate pre-delivery and post-delivery
  2. Credit assessment is continuous — Not just at onboarding
  3. Limits must be enforced — No exceptions without approval
  4. Mitigation has cost — Balance protection vs. expense
  5. Watch for deterioration — Early action prevents losses
  6. Have a default playbook — Know what to do when it happens

References

  • Basel Committee Credit Risk Standards
  • ISDA Credit Support Documentation
  • Trade credit insurance industry guides
  • Moody’s Analytics Credit Risk